Why New Hires Sometimes Fall Short
A Deep Dive into the Real Issues
Darryl Horn, Wednesday, 4 September 2024 • 5 min read
It’s not uncommon for new hires to ultimately prove unsuitable for their roles. This issue can stem from various factors, and often, it's easy for the blame to be placed on the individual. However, a more nuanced exploration reveals that the root causes can be broader and more complex, involving management practices, onboarding processes, recruitment procedures, and the candidate themselves.
1. Managerial Effectiveness: Beyond Blame
When an employee fails to meet expectations, it's tempting for managers to point fingers. However, this approach can overlook crucial factors within the manager’s own domain. Effective management requires more than just assigning tasks—it involves mentoring, providing constructive feedback, and ensuring alignment with the team’s goals.
The role of a manager is not just to direct but to guide and support. If an employee fails, it’s often a reflection of the support system, not just the individual’s capabilities.
If a manager has not adequately supported an employee, the employee may struggle with unclear expectations, insufficient resources, or lack of direction. Managers need to reflect on whether they have provided sufficient support and guidance. For instance, have they offered regular check-ins and feedback? Have they created an environment where the employee feels comfortable seeking help? A failure in these areas can significantly impact an employee's performance, making it essential for managers to evaluate their own practices.
2. Quality of Onboarding: Integrating New Hires
The onboarding process is critical in setting up new employees for success. A well-designed onboarding programme should align with the company's culture and clearly outline role expectations. If onboarding is inadequate, employees may find themselves struggling to integrate, feeling disconnected from the company culture, or unsure of their responsibilities.
To address these issues, organisations should invest in comprehensive onboarding that includes not just initial training, but also ongoing support and integration activities. This approach helps new hires acclimate to their roles and understand the company’s values and norms, which can greatly enhance their chances of success.
3. Recruitment Process: Ensuring the Right Fit
An effective recruitment process is fundamental in selecting the right candidate. This involves more than just reviewing resumes and conducting interviews; it requires rigorous due diligence to ensure that the candidate’s skills, experience, and values align with the role and the organisation’s culture.
The cost of a bad hire extends far beyond the salary. It impacts team morale, productivity, and the company’s bottom line. Investing in a robust recruitment process pays off in the long run.
According to the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), the average cost of a bad hire is approximately £12,000. Organisations can improve their recruitment process by incorporating practical assessments that reflect real job tasks, conducting thorough reference checks, and involving multiple team members in the interview process to gain diverse perspectives. Additionally, behavioural interviews and situational questions can help assess how candidates might handle specific challenges they will face in the role. By focusing on these aspects, organisations can better gauge whether a candidate is truly suitable for the role.
4. Candidate Suitability: Beyond the Interview
Sometimes, the mismatch can be attributed to the candidate themselves. During interviews, candidates may present themselves in a manner that aligns well with what the interviewer wants to hear, which can be misleading. In reality, their skills or working style might not match what is needed for the role.
Interviews are just one piece of the puzzle. Effective hiring requires a deeper understanding of the candidate’s true capabilities and how they fit into the company’s culture.
Organisations should be mindful of this possibility and aim for a holistic assessment approach. This includes checking references thoroughly and considering the candidate’s past performance in similar roles. Furthermore, assessing a candidate’s long-term potential and how well they align with the company's culture can help in identifying those who are not just good at interviewing but also genuinely suited for the role.
Conclusion
When a new hire turns out to be unsuitable for a role, it’s essential to look beyond blaming the individual. By evaluating managerial effectiveness, the quality of onboarding, the recruitment process, and the candidate’s true fit, organisations can gain a clearer understanding of where the issues lie. Addressing these areas proactively can improve overall employee fit and satisfaction, ultimately leading to a more effective and harmonious workplace.